Friday, November 2, 2012


In our class Wednesday, we discussed the philosophy of race, and how we employ faulty logic to discriminate or differentiate between individuals.  What I find fascinating is the possibility of understanding the principles behind our logic in discrimination to be applied almost universally in judgments of other people. I mentioned in class the negative effects of not only racial judgments, but also class and gender discrimination. While we use observations to distinguish between people every day (if we could not, we couldn’t tell anyone apart), certain physical or behavioral markers are categorized in such a manner to the benefits of some and the advantage of others. Yet what makes these markers unjust is that they are not based in reality, or perpetuate a reality already in place( for example, because of perceptions of race, proportionally, minorities are over represented in impoverished and imprisoned populations, reinforcing original racial and class perceptions). What I find interesting in our ideas of humans is the idea of the ideal human being against which we judge everyone. In every characteristic, society has one that is beneficial and one that is negative, i.e. black vs. white, rich vs. poor, male vs. female, tall vs. short.  In analyzing a person’s worth, we often use this calculus to determine a person’s worth- a sort of utilitarian calculus of worth. Yet in performing such discrimination, we set up individuals for failure, as man is not infallible- upon further analysis, we all have faults, and many “faults” or “negative” characteristics are not in fact based in reality, or even negatives at all. Also,  would like to ponder the possibility that although systems of privilege often help one population at the expense of another, any system is inherently negative to not only the population as a whole, but also to the privileged society.  While the benefits of the system may outweigh the negatives for individuals, the weight of obligation on a community can be passed down generationally, and even creates a communally imprisoned society that has to buy into a system in order to establish an identity. I am not trying to suggest that systems of inequality are unfair in their negative effects to both populations, but I think that in order to understand amending wrongs of the past, or the present, we have to realize the internalized ideology of the systems we participate in, and how these systems can isolate or manipulate us in ways that stifle individuality and creativity.

No comments:

Post a Comment