Friday, November 2, 2012

A Look at the Myth of Reverse Racism



We talked extensively on Wednesday about racism and the idea of reverse racism. We eventually concluded that other forms of supposed racism do not have the same effect as racism against African Americans. Tim Wise, and anti-racist essayist, wrote an essay titled: A Look at the Myth of Reverse Racism. He starts by saying that he had a high school student ask him why he only seemed to be concerned about white racism towards people of color, and a number of students wondered why Wise did not get upset about the slurs that people use to describe whites. 

Wise points out that the words used to describe whites are silly and juvenile and “so utterly pathetic that they hardly qualify as racial slurs at all, let alone on a par with those that have been historically deployed against people of color.” Wise states that “people of color are limited in the repertoire of slurs they can use against white” and that those they can use sound more comical than hateful.
Slurs against blacks were created to dehumanize them, prove their inferiority. When a group of people hold all the power, they gain the ability to limit opportunities and define the terms of your existence. “Power is like body armor.” Wise uses this to claim that, while whites do not all have the same degree of power, as a whole they have more than they need when compared to the amount than people of color.

Within class systems, people compete for things against others of their same status: rich competes against rich, and poor against poor. Poor whites are significantly less “typified as pathological, dangerous, lazy” the way poor blacks are. Nor are they treated the same was as poor Hispanics.
Wise makes a point that when politicians want to “scapegoat welfare recipients” they don’t use “Bubba and Crystal from some Appalachian trailer park; they choose Shawonda Jefferson from the Robert Taylor Homes, with her seven children.” Reports show that white welfare recipients are treated far better by caseworkers and are given more help in finding new jobs than their other racial counterparts. 

There are plenty of ways that the more powerful groups can use racism against less powerful groups of people without having to break the law. One could discriminate in employment and not be subjected to penalty; as long as they can claim that the applicant of color was “less qualified”.
Wise makes the claim that “when white churches start getting burned down by militant blacks who spray paint ‘kill the honkies’ on the sidewalks outside, then maybe I’ll take seriously these concerns over ‘reverse racism’.”

What do you guys think about reverse racism? Do you agree with Wise’s argument about the differences between white racism against blacks and black racism against whites?

2 comments:

  1. I think that a lot of what Wise is saying is similar to what we agreed on in class. We agreed that no matter what someone says about whites, it doesn’t have the history as someone who would say something about blacks. Wise seems to downplay reverse racism more than we did as a class, but I think that he is in many ways right. The slurs that are used to describe whites are nowhere near as offensive (part of this is because of the history) and that largely contributes to the fact that reverse racism is not the same. I think that Wise brings up an interesting point with the welfare example that was not something that I had thought about, but he is right. When thinking about people on welfare, people would be lying if they said they thought about poor whites. This shows how deeply rooted things like this are in society and it raises the question, will we ever be able to move past it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Wise's argument is an extreme opinion of what I said in class. Any one can make a derogatory comment about another race, but the effects of the comment or action are completely different. Like Wise says, "power is like body armor". What he is ultimately saying is that when black people talk about whites, it is not getting them anywhere. But because white people are in power in this country, when they create a hostility around other races, it's effects are shown economically, socially, and politically in our country. The reverse is not true when it comes to hostility against white people. Thought the comments, hate crimes, and groups formed to discriminate against other races are are equally awful, what is produced from each has a different outcome on the way our society is run and functions. So what Wise is saying is true in his argument that racism is different from race to race.

    ReplyDelete