In
class we have defined justice in many different ways. Initially as a class we
defined it by some high sense of urgency. With this sense of urgency as the
foundation there would be a building of fairness that was comprised of
impartiality to access to the judicial system that would result in proportional
consequence to the action. As the class went on we looked at authors such as
Plato who looked into the definition of justice at a much greater level. At one
point of his exploration, the definition of justice was presented as the
advantage of the stronger. In those cases ‘the stronger’ was seen as the head
of some sort of governing body. Unfortunately we cannot all live in Plato’s
republic, and in some cases ‘the stronger’ uses the American justice system to
create large social injustices.
The
death penalty has seemed to find its way to an agenda of pressing topics of
social injustice in the American justice system. One major failure in the realm
of the death penalty is the large amount of minorities placed on death row.
Less than ten years ago it was reported that in the jurisdiction of the US
Military that eighty six percent of its death row was comprised of minorities.
In the jurisdiction of the US Government the percent of death row that was
comprised of minorities was seventy seven percent.
If
we have a justice system built on the fact that everyman has the right to be
considered equal to the other and that they have the right to some sort of fair
trial, why is it the fact that “while white victims account for
approximately one-half of all murder victims, 80% of all Capital cases involve
white victims.” The advantage of the stronger has played into a
prejudice that has unfairly taken the lives of minorities that might have not
been taken if they were white. To go along with the statistics on percentage of
death rows comprised of minorities “as of October 2002, 12 people have
been executed where the defendant was white and the murder victim black,
compared with 178 black defendants executed for murders with white victims.”
When Plato explored the idea that
justice is the advantage of the stronger he assumed that the advantage played
into the needs of the people that the stronger was governing. Unfortunately in
the, nowhere near utopian, American justice system this advantage has been used
as a sick form of minority population control. Is it fair to assume that the
gap between minorities and whites sentenced to death row experienced a fair
trial where the consequences were proportional in the two sets of cases?
Justice is based on a clear level of consistency in the law, and this is
another instance on where the American justice system has failed to realize
that even they can create some of the greatest injustices in the country.
http://www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/race-and-death-penalty
I really agree with you on this point- this maintains the philosophers' idea that this sort of atrocity is due to a system that is out of order, an unjust system. I think that with the figures it is pretty clear to see that the cases were not proportional when viewing the outcomes of them along the lines of race.
ReplyDelete